BREAKING THE CODE
posted in General |Sometime back I offered the thought that the one term most despised by left wing liberals is “Re-distribution of income, or wealth”. While dreaming up their great social schemes they are frequently challenged (rightly so) by the simple question – how do we pay for all this?? And in an effort to avoid that ultimate question, the like to play semantics. Think about it. “Fairness, equality, affirmative action, sharing the wealth, upward mobility, diversity, affordability, and the list goes on. But when you cut through the fog, it all comes down to taking from some citizens and giving to others. Now, the Democrats deeply despise admitting that – so they look for other ways to describe the process. Imaginative semantics.
Let’s face it, you can’t get a lot of money from people who don’t pay taxes anyway. That leaves the rest of us who do. I’d feel a lot better if we just called a spade a spade rather than the flimsy lingo clearly intended to disguise the arithmetic facts of life. And then we have a Prez who likes to tell people that they have the RIGHT to enjoy largess paid by someone else. So when you see these catch words listed above, just remember that when the code is broken, redistribution of wealth remains the goal of Obama economics. All of this under the umbrella of “change”. They would have you believe that redistribution is a kind word. Think again.