29th
July
2008
I was amused last week to listen and read about news that Michelle Obama has been assigned to a different role in the Obama campaign. She will no longer address policy matters and will be involved as a back-up player. While announcing the change, the Obama handlers stressed her great talents and the critically important role she will continue to play as the campaign heads for the White House. But it occurred to me that there was more to the change than that. – i.e., if she is so talented and valuable, why make the change to a secondary role?
Just ask yourself a couple of questions. If she is such an asset to the campaign, why wouldn’t she be out in front with all vocal guns blazing?? On the other hand, if her tendency to get foot-in- mouth disease is looked upon as a negative, wouldn’t she be better located on the back burner?
Easy choice – she is now on the back burner. The Obama handlers made a good decision. To many folks she comes across as a black lady with a chip on her shoulder
posted in General |
20th
June
2008
Prominent historians and sociologists have observed that it takes 40-50 years for major technological change to take full effect in the USA. It was true for Steam engines, railroads, the commercial aircraft industry, Radio, TV, electronics, antibiotics, computers etc etc. Major change just doesn’t take place overnight. Right now, we live in an oil driven economy and the elites huff and puff about about ending our dependence on oil – particularly foreign oil. In their anti-oil campaign, they simply ignore harsh practicality — all in the name of the environment and global warming. Under the best of circumstances, it would take decades to replace oil with alternate energy sources. No matter, they say, we MUST end the dependence on oil – now.
The leftist drum beat continues – no drilling for oil, no processing oil shale, no nuclear power. Just rely on windmills, solar panels, water power etc etc. and let hundreds of thousands of cars run out of gas. What do they think hundreds of thousands of people will do without gasoline until this pie in the sky millenium arrives? What is the game plan for the intervening 30-40 years? How does our economy function? Details, details, they say. We have to see the big picture.
The tragic fact is that many of these nutcases really believe this baloney and they are willing to place their global warming hokum over the priority of the security of the country. And it is equally tragic that we have 500 elected people in Washington who don’t have the gumption to stand up and be counted. Gumption, gutless or ignorant. Take your pick.
posted in General |
9th
June
2008
If Mr Obama wants “change”, all he has to do is read the newspapers or watch TV. There is lots of change going on – all around him. Doing something about it is a different story.
The Dow Jones average is bouncing back a forth between 12,000 and 13,000, sometimes leaping or dipping by 350 points is a day. It’s enough to keep investors in their sneakers carrying pole vault poles.
Unemployment has risen to 5.5 %. Not good. Gasoline averages $4 per gallon at the pump – $4.50 on the West coast. Big surge of support and demand for public transportation.
The price of crude oil is nearing $140 with $150 in sight.
The Republicans point to successes in Iraqi and the Dems ignore anything they can’t bad-mouth.
On energy or war supporting programs,the Dems are dragging their feet. “Fiddling while Rome burns??” Some things change, some don’t.
Ethanol doesn’t seem to have helped much in the battle for energy independence. In fact, it seems to have hurt. Has anyone admitted that they made a mistake? A very costly mistake?
I haven’t noticed — has Las Vegas quoted the odds of McCain vs Obama??
posted in General |
7th
June
2008
The Presidential election of 1960 was a landmark event in the political history of this country. It was Kennedy vs Nixon. More important than the outcome, it was the birth of the Pitchman in days of National TV. If ever there was a guy born for politics and TV, it was Jack Kennedy. H e was young, handsome, articulate, bright and engaging. His TV image was superb. In comparison, he was all the things that Nixon was not. Obviously, Kennedy won.
In some of the subsequent elections there was no spellbinder and the influence of TV was less decisive. Then along came Ronald Reagan who was a pitchman par excellance, and Bill Clinton who also was impressive with words (Gotta give him credit). They both won twice. Now we have another word merchant – Obama. Where there is a difference in TV imagery, the pitchman clearly has the advantage. McCain could have a clear advantage in dealing with the issues, but he will be swimming upstream against the flowery rhetoric of Obama who keeps saying the same things. Right now, the favored son of the mass media — written and visual – is Obama and that will make the pitchmanship advantage even greater unless John Q Public can see thru the rhetorical smokescreen.
Obama is a rookie and he is simply not equipped to deal with matters of substance. Maybe his “eloquence” will backfire, but on a going in basis, he will have the advantage in debates and appearances.
Do you really feel comfortable with Obama driving the train, flipping the switch , or saying “go”?? Flambouyant phrases do not equate to sound judgment. S far, I am not convinced!
posted in General |
15th
May
2008
In the hey day of rural America there were any number of periodicals that featured gems of wisdom from the farm folks. A memorable one (for me) was “You can take a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink” How true it is. You don’t hear this old axiom very ofter nowadays, but it is truer than ever — particularly when it comes to education.
In the last 3-4 decades we have spend ungodly amounts on education — at all levels, pre-school. elementary, secondary, College, Graduate school, etc. Hundreds of millions. And the solution posed by all of the Pro-Ed people is just to keep throwing money at the problem. But obviously, that simple solution doesn’t work, and virtually all of the data compiled affirms that conclusion. Don’t grade students, don’t encourage competition, don’t use tests, don’t enforce discipline. And what does all of that get us?? The plain fact is that kids will get educated when they want to be educated — and that falls on the shoulders of parents. No one else.
You can hire the best teachers, pay them more, build super facilities and spend more an more and more — and just keep pumping the money down what seems to be an endlessly deep hole. But we still get “graduates” who can’t read or write but can utterly disrupt the school operations. Are most of these kids inner city blacks? Yes they are — and at the risk of being branded a racist or bigot, I’m willing to stand up when the facts are on my side. Just as you can’t take a horse to water and make him drink, you can’t take black hoodlums to school and MAKE them learn. If they ever learn, it will be when they WANT to learn.
For me it is very disappointing to see and hear Bill Cosby speak to the obvious while so many black “leaders” keep spouting the old story –” Victimhood” and “White man’s problem”. Baloney, Every minority that ever came to this country fought their way upward and earned a place in this society, and they were led by leaders who didn’t just sit back and whimper and whine. That’s what is so contemptuous about Bab Bam’s preacher. Disgusting.
The secondary schools are burdened by far too many who just don’t want to learn — and many of their black leaders support them.
posted in General |
14th
May
2008
At election time, there are a few thoughts worthy of special attention. How are these for starters??
The easiest task for politicians is spending someone else’s money. Any quarrel here??
The ability of a government to transfer wealth to some of its citizens depends entirely on its ability to take it away from someone else.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. For doubters, see immediately preceding comment.
“Change” is like beauty — all in the eyes of the beholder. My change is good — yours is not.
All a clever lawyer needs is a Half of a fact. Not the whole fact — half is generally enough. Don’t get carried away about this Justice stuff. Get your client off — nothing is in second place.
Think about how many idiots and dumdums can cancel your vote. Still think that your vote counts?
Still sympathetic to illegals, convicts, and other — “voters”??
posted in General |
28th
April
2008
WOT HAPPENED?
Nine month ago, Hilly looked like a shoo-in for the Dem nomination, and now she is hanging on by her fingernails. Out of the blue came Bam Bam who is now the odds on favorite. When Hilly looks at herself in the mirror every morning, she has to ask the obvious question, “wot happened”?
For sure, he is a smooth pitchman and loves the limelight. On the other hand, she had a lot of support from the biggies — with lots of money and a well oiled organization. But somehow her messages ran thin and he gathered a lot of broad based support and nationwide momentum. It all comes down to a simple analysis — the blacks will rally to Bab Bam and the Femmes will rally to Hilly. The rest of the analyses is hogwash. For now, all McCain has to do is sit back and let them take potshots at each other. Hilly may have one too many far left endorsements and BamBam has a Pastor he doesn’t need.
The Democratic convention deserves primetime time and will no doubt get it. O’Reilly will have a field day every night.
posted in General |
28th
April
2008
TEST
Last time I could not Post and Publish. Glitch? This is a test.
posted in General |
15th
March
2008
NOW IT IS PENNSYLVANIA
Texas abd Ohio have come and gone and now it will be up to Pennsylvania to decide the Demo Presidenial nominee. Or will it? There is still a chance the neither Bam-Bam nor Hilly will have enough delegates to be a flat out winner. Can you imagine the hassle over these “super” delegates waiting in the wings? What will be the political payoffs to secure their commitments — whichever the way they flip. It will be backroom politics at its best.
After 2 weeks of vacation, I am still playing catch-up by reading all of the accounts in which Bam Bam and Hillary criticize each other. As far as I can see thus far, they are both right. Now we can see who McCain's Veep will be. In the meantime, bye-bye Spitzer. His treatment will not likely be gentle since there are a lot of people who just don't like him, and for good reason. But gotta hand it to him — he kept his charade going for quite a while without being caught. And even his left wing media sponsors have not yet run to his rescue. I wonder if the Yankees have asked him not to wear their logo cap?
Meanwhile, Pennsylvanis will be the capital of the US — at least for 3 more weeks!
posted in General |
28th
February
2008
SHOWDOWN
Texas and Ohio — the newest version of the Gunfight at the OK Corral. All the marbles are on the table, and for Hillary it might be Custer's last stand. We might reflect on the financial morass that is Social Security reform. Both Bama and Hill voted to kill Bush's proposal for private acounts to broaden the base of retirement income for older folks. They defeated the effort without proposing anything else. Now it is a dead letter awaiting the next wake-up call. But if the Social Security financial mess is huge, the Medical/Health Care mess is multiple times worse — big enough to bankrupt the country. And in all of their campaign eloquence about Universal Heath care, what about how we intend to pay for it?? Nada!
An eloquent writer , Dr Mark hendrikson, offered a sage comments in the press last week — “Government can only give people wealth that it has taken from others.” Like maybe,taxes?? Taxes is a bad word to many who save and invest. But not to Bama and Hill. Taxes put the gasoline in the White House Limousine. Does it bother you that we have 2 csndidates who simply try to out-promise each other by committing expendtures from funds we don't have?? And they call that a debate??
posted in General |