Worthless
posted in General |WORTHLESS
I play golf with an interesting group of guys — all about the same age, plus or minus 10 years. It is a mixed bunch – ranging from blue collar to white collar to professional, to business owners, to teachers etc., with typically varied views in the political spectrum. Over a warm cup of coffee, the conversation focused on California's Junior Senator, Barbara Boxer, and her asisnine behavior in recent weeks. First there was the sideshow over the Ohio election when the plurality was way over 100,000 votes for Geo Bush, and more recently Boxer's disgusting effort to impugn the integrity of Condolleeza Rice at the Senatorial confirmation hearing. Without exception, all 13 guys deplored the notion of Boxer representing California. It's bad enough to be called the land of fruits and nuts and being the homeland of a repulsive flake like Michael Moore. Now we have our ditzy Senator, Ms Boxer to boot.
Our group has no issue with female leaders, and Senator Diane Feinstein wins high marks. But not Boxer. Senator Feinstein is a lady who has earned the respect of all of our group, but our well grounded group feels that Boxer's brain in a mosquito's bladder would look like a pea in a bass drum. If you want to see the difference between a lady and a broad, you need to look no further. Many of our group think Boxer should be termed Senator Dimwit, but the majority preferred Senator Worthless. That name seemed to be appropriate and it stuck — Senator Worthless. We think it would be great theater for the Leader of the Senate speaking from the podium to say. “the Chair recognizes Senator Worthless of California”. The term may not be flattering, but it is accurate. At least we all would know to whom he is referring. She is an embarrassment to California and its citizens.
Six more years. Isn't that pathetic??